Deadlines/Brief

Music videos are so 80s/90s, right? They belong with the era when MTV screened wall-to-wall vids instead of 'reality' TV? Try telling that to the millions who bought Gangnam Style; were they really simply loving the music? 1.6bn (and still climbing) have viewed the video on YT, not to mention the many re-makes (school eg, eg2), viral ads + celeb link-ups (even political protest in Seoul) - and it doesn't matter how legit it is, this nightmare for daydream Beliebers is making a lot of money, even from the parodies + dislikes. All this for a simple dance track that wouldn't have sounded out of place in 1990 ... but had a fun vid. This meme itself was soon displaced by the Harlem Shake. Music vids even cause diseases it seems!
This blog explores every aspect of this most postmodern of media formats, including other print-based promo tools used by the industry, its fast-changing nature, + how fans/audiences create/interact. Posts are primarily written with Media students/educators in mind. Please acknowledge the blog author if using any resources from this blog - Mr Dave Burrowes

Showing posts with label exemplar vids. Show all posts
Showing posts with label exemplar vids. Show all posts

Thursday, 9 June 2016

Blogging on 'Exemplar vids'

Start of 1 of my vid analyses: Hyperlinks,
wider research, sub-headings, top summary
There's no single right way to blog on individual videos you've looked at, but you do need to be clear on what sort of points/details you're after, and the overall purpose of undertaking this work.
Remember, you've got 3 years worth of IGS/StG student blogs to help you as well as this blog.
I'll set out the minimal expectations at the bottom of this post, but first...

QUICK LINKS:Music video examples tag; 
Pixies: Bagboy (individual video analysis); 
Pixies artist case study; 
Hetero-normativity: exploring a theme through multiple videos; 
Music videos I've selected + blogged on for raising useful issues 
Some female fronted bands
I blogged on several dance vids, amongst many others, to give you an idea of good style, layout + organisation:



WHY BLOG IN DETAIL ON INDIVIDUAL MUSIC VIDS?
  • Its a basic principle of any Media Studies coursework brief that you cannot create a suitable text without developing a thorough, detailed familiarity with the key codes and conventions of a particular format

Sunday, 2 August 2015

Rammstein: Sonne (industrial metal eg)

ACT: Rammstein
TRACK: Sonne
YEAR: 2001
DIRECTOR: Jörn Heitmann
MAIN AUDIENCE: Male, 15-24/34

Rob posted on this in August and I thought I'd add a few comments; interesting choice! I know the track well but had never seen the video.
Here's the vid first of all:


A few initial points:
  • perf. through lip-synching, but without a translation its hard to say whether its narr or concept!
  • fairly fast-paced editing, with some long takes though
  • colour and lighting a key consideration
  • vid can only be understand if we grasp both the precise genre and target audience
  • skilful cross-cutting is key to the preferred reading
GENRE/AUDIENCE: Loosely, its heavy metal, but more specifically its 'industrial' (or industrial metal) - other comparable bands would include Rage Against the Machine and Nine Inch Nails. The typical audience for this would be male youth: 15-24, but comfortably extending to 15-34 (25-34 = 'mature youth'). Industrial metal goes beyond the traditional guitar/bass/drum/vocal line-up to incorporate recorded, synth-processed sound, and is also seen as 'dark' - a world away from the 'hair metal' of Bon Jovi, Motley Crue and other giants of mainstream metal.
The crashing sledgehammers, and the sparks that fly up, are a neat signifier of the genre within the video.

GENDER: The youth male audience ensures that the Snow White depicted is heavily sexualised to fit the male gaze: the tight top, thick, bright red lipstick and the long take which lingers on her suspenders. They've taken an archetypal signifier or icon of (Disney) innocence and purity and flipped it to fit with their darker vision.

Wednesday, 30 October 2013

DANCE EG: Fragma - You Are Alive (2001, Ger)

1st shot: an Ibiza link perhaps?
Fragma -

Dir: unknown, 2001.

Trance.

Lyrics.


SUMMARY
For me, one of the worst promos I've ever seen, though it is very professionally produced with strong cinematography. There is little going on bar the incessant objectification of the vocalist, who we often see running, Baywatch slo-mo style, or dousing herself on the beach wearing sheer clothing, plus the 'exotic' (depending on the viewer of course) setting - which seems utterly incongruous for the track. Also features an attempt to eroticize fruit! We follow the singer through a village, though this is a world away from The Verve video which tracks the singer walking along; our location here is left polysemic, as if anchorage might detract from its exotic 'otherness'. The track itself features a ridiculously long fade-out: 20 seconds!!!
I make some comparisons below to Bond movies and a Lita Ford video....



The cinematography is sharp; variable focus is used to good effect, a particularly suitable diegetic 'effect' given the musical genre

Monday, 17 December 2012

Daft Punk - TechnoLogic vid

ACT: DAFT PUNK
TRACK: TECHNOLOGIC
ALBUM: HUMAN AFTER ALL
YEAR: 2005
GENRE: HOUSE/DANCE-POP
AUDIENCE: 18-24+ (by now 15-34)
DIRECTOR: DAFT PUNK (3rd self-directed vid)



By 2005 Daft Punk were a major act, with massive worldwide singles and albums behind them and the backing of one of the world's biggest record labels, EMI (through their subsidiary label Virgin), to boot. This shows in the video: it may lack shot variety in large part, but the budget is there for all to see with the central robot figure an impressive hybrid of the Terminator and Chucky from the Child's Play franchise. The distinct horror overtones are something we might more easily associate with industrial music, which tends to display a strand of technophobia, and also points to a band willing to sacrifice daytime screenings to target their core, club-going 18-24/18-34 audience. It would be hard to see this getting airtime pre-watershed.

The layers of intertextuality don't stop with what appear to be straightforward horror/sci-fi film signifiers though: the track gained wide exposure through being sampled in a Busta Rhymes track (with Missy Elliott on vocals); the track was used for both an iPod ad and a Motorola phone ad, featured in top-rated teen drama The OC (which has a wide global following), in 2009 was featured in two separate car ads. As the track's Wiki further reports:
It is a playable track on the iOS games Tap Tap Revenge and Tap Tap Dance, and was sampled for the video game DJ Hero. In an episode of the TV show America's Best Dance Crew, crew Kaba Modern performed to a master mix of this song on February 7, 2008. "Technologic" was also featured in the game Dance Central 2.
What we also see is another Daft Punk trait: anonymising the duo in the act. The doll itself could act as a stand-in for the animations they did in the past, but we also get two futuristic guitar-playing characters, dressed like security men or police with their full-face dark helmets. Their movement is notably minimal and stiff.

Another really key feature is the link up between the vid and the stage set: the mysterious, enigmatic pyramids formed a centrepiece of the tour that was already ongoing when this video was released. As we've seen, since 2005 the change in the music business from a product-sales industry to a live performance + merchandise + archive (long tail) sales industry has been pronounced, and this was an early indicator of a band that saw that change coming - as an act advertising iPods, a key driver of that drive, should!

The length of takes is quite remarkable, and perhaps an attempt to stand out from the crowd: its certainly counter-intuitive to have such a slow-paced video. Arguably the sheer splendour of their mise-en-scene, together with the impressive SFX, is doing the hard work for them, but it still seems odd and a little unsatisfying. Its not the only time we've seen this: the iconic Da Funk video featured many such long takes too.

Saturday, 14 January 2012

POMO, WEB EXCL.: Morbid Angel silent movie vid

Perhaps reflecting the hype around The Artist, the 2011 French silent movie thats receiving critical acclaim right now, here's a highly postmodern vid taking on the media language of silent movies but from an unusual source: death metal icons Morbid Angel. Personally I think the vid's quite poor, and the slow pace just doesn't work for the genre, BUT it will generate debate and thus publicity. They gave the online premiere to the magazine site Terrorizer, a move increasingly used (we also see video premieres on the schedules of C4, E4 etc quite commonly) and so something you could think about/write about with regards to use of technology.






Evanescence also provide a good eg of promoting a vid through ... a vid! They gave an interview on set of their latest to MTV, ensuring airplay and publicity: http://loudwire.com/evanescence-inside-lookvideo-my-heart-is-broken/

Monday, 28 November 2011

Video Gaga? Various Analyses

From the far reaches of the web, a rather curious take on Lady Gaga...a force for a global conspiracy?!
an extract:
Gaga is not giving birth to a human but to a “new race” within humanity. The symbolism of the video makes it clear that this birth is not natural, but artificially provoked. A twisted immaculate conception. As is the case for most Lady Gaga videos, the theme of mind control is important in the video. It is the process through which the metamorphosis will take place.  In Monarch programming terms, we are witnessing the birth of a new persona within the “core personality” of humanity. The birth is happening within the minds of people and is visually represented by creepy facial horns.
If you really want to read more: source.
The same site also prognosticates on Britney Spears: an extract:
Britney indeed bears many classic symptoms of a Monarch programming victim. Further, the video of Hold it Against Me contains many visual clues that hint at Britney’s mental prison.

The next one I came across via Ellie's blog, a detailed look at Bad Romance. The writer sees Gaga as a feminist icon - I'm not so sure, tho' there is definitely a case to make for that interpretation:

The Art of Gaga- Lady Gaga’s Bad Romance Music Video Explained

[http://elenamusic.wordpress.com/2011/02/09/the-art-of-gaga-lady-gagas-bad-romance-music-video-explained/]
Lady Gaga is an artist.
What is an artist? Musicians have blurred the lines between artist and being godly, being a role model and having something to say, or someone who is just famous for the sake of being famous. But, what is an artist?
An artist is someone whom their creations conveys a message. As the observer, we are the ones to decipher the creation and come to our own conclusions of what the message is. The message and the medium, however creative they are, contribute to how interesting the artist is.
Lady Gaga is an artist because she has a lot to say, and a very colorful way of saying it as well. I would overhear people saying, “she can’t sing” and I think that’s ridiculous. Of course she can sing, she has an amazing voice. I respect Lady Gaga as an artist because in my own interpretation of her music and music videos, I get a message that wants to change things. She sends messages to express female frustration, and is changing art to shake things up in the world.
Even though these music videos have been out for a while, I wanted to write my own interpretation of these music videos. I would talk to my friends about the importance of “Bad Romance” and “Telephone” and my friends would say it was garbage. How could I have such a different opinion about these videos than my friends? Didn’t we see the same music video? These music videos make the observer think, you have to think critically of what the message is. Here’s my interpretation:
Lady Gaga- Bad Romance

In Lady Gaga’s “Bad Romance” video, we are subjected to different scenarios. We have the the coffin scene, where Gaga is coming out of the “coffin”, so to speak, as a monster. I think this music video was kind of the birth of Gaga’s journey as a true artist. She was coming to make a statement. Also as a self-proclaimed “monster”, she is also telling the viewer that it’s ok to be different.
We also have the scene where Gaga is in a sheer, skin colored outfit. She has pink hair and she is being tied down and being forced to remove her clothes. In this scene, the big eyes represent innocence to me, and the people that are taking off her clothes are taking away her innocence, forcing someone against their will. Also, the fact that they are taking her clothes away, they are stripping her into a sexual figure.
One of the biggest scenes to me is when she is in the diamond outfit, dancing in front of all the suitors while they are bidding on her. She is a courtesan, a prostitute, being forced against her will to be sexual for these men. She is reduced to a financial figure for her sex. She obviously resents the fact at the end of the video. Where you see Gaga strutting to the bed to the suitor who was the top bidder. She kills him. An act of revenge against everything that happened to her. Her being stripped away of her innocence, being reduced for a sexual figure to be bid on by men.

It’s a very feminist video. There are also images of her as a “monster” and it’s very obvious that she shape has been altered in the video. Her spine is protruding out of her skin, and her curves are accentuated. Has she turned into a sex monster? This video is retaliating against men. It is showing how women are shown in the media, and in real life as sexual objects, only there to tantalize and satisfy men. It has made women into sexual monsters, both wanting to be sexual, but fighting against the stereotypes men put upon them. And in the end, Gaga is taking a stand, that she is not going to be ruled by a man, that she is her own woman.

What about the violence? Is that called for?
There is a lot of violence in movies, men make the violence and now it’s tolerated as a male thing. It’s also tying into the gender stereotype that only men can get angry. When men get angry, they get violent. Women are not supposed to get angry, and hence, not be violent. The violence is a masculine trait. Gaga takes on this masculine trait to express her revenge, and assert her independence from men. The lyrics “I want your loving and I want your revenge” fits in perfectly with the images portrayed. There is definitely confusion in today’s age of what is a strong woman. Is she sexual and successful? Is she desired by all men and at the same time making a lot of money?
Why do people question Lady Gaga’s sex? Is she a man or a woman? She is taking feminism head on, using masculine traits to assert her womanhood. She really has picked up where Madonna has left off. Madonna started a lot of controversies with her sexual videos, questioning women’s roles in society. She wanted to show women could be successful and  sexual at the same time. Gaga is sending her own message, and using violence and intense visuals to assert her femininity, and masculinity at the same time.
I think it’s brilliant what Lady Gaga is doing to bring the music video back. There is so much open to interpretation and people can conclude their own vision of Gaga’s music videos. What does she say to you? The fact is that she’s shaping a new era of how women are looked at. Am I just reading in between the lines too much? I know I’m not because that’s the point of art, to take away from it your own interpretation of the art. To question, think and make the art mean something to you.
I will also review the music video “Telephone” because we open up even more cans of worms.
What does Bad Romance mean to you?

Thursday, 10 November 2011

M.LANG: Deconstructionism, pomo, DMode eg

Here's a term that will pop up frequently when analysing vids (and is linked to pomo): DECONSTRUCTIONISM
I'm going to use an eg of a Depeche Mode vid for No Good...


ACT: Depeche Mode
TRACK: It's No Good 

YEAR: 1997
DIRECTOR: Anton Corbijn
GENRE: Electro-Pop/Dance
MAIN AUDIENCE: M/F 15-34+
(both fe/male gaze, 2ndary 35-44 aud from 80s + aspirational tweens + younger teens [10-14])



Gahan ironically dressed as a 70s lounge lizard
META-NARRATIVE + INTERTEXTUALITY
Now, postmodernists argue there is no essential reality, everything is clouded as we view the world through symbols which represent symbols ... There is no such thing as quality; a Kylie Minogue lyric and a Shakespeare are of equal merit - there is simply no objectivity from which we can make such judgements. That poses issues for standard concepts such as genre. Being postmodern, some postmodernists would of course disagree with this depiction, as nothing can be truly defined!
As for this song and video, its difficult to pin down what we're referring to when we say the text:

The music video for "It's No Good" was directed by Anton Corbijn, depicting the

Tuesday, 2 August 2011

Perf vid: Avenged Sevenfold

Kyle posted on this one.

TRACK: Afterlife
YEAR: 2008
DIRECTOR: Wayne Isham
GENRE: metalcore, heavy metal
MAIN AUDIENCE: male 15-24



Another good eg of a perf vid, with some fairly simple additional material thrown in. The 3 shots from 0:24-0:27 are a good example to remember: CU of singer to MS with 2 band members in frame to CU again. Camera movement is frequently seen, again this helps create a sense of realism, as if its a genuine live performance, and dynamism. Cutting into a camera movement (eg 0:41, cut from drummer to CU of singer, cam tilting down as part of tracking the singer in CU) reinforces this.
The warehouse setting is suitably 'metal' but seen as not quite enough to keep people reviewing this over and over, so we get some nice SFX and a switch to a white backdrop (with added ghosting effect) at around 1:06. A costume change has also taken place (all still very metal, with tattoos and black slothing much in evidence!), and simple shots of one of the band releasing a bird are very effectively crosscut through this section. When we return to the warehouse setting, shots of a tarantula on a band member's hand help avoid this being a case of just repeating the earlier footage, and provides a neat bridge between the two settings.

Indeed, at 1:35 we see a great example of one of the simplest FX you can pull off IF YOU TAKE ENOUGH COVERAGE: a jump effect by cutting 3 shots, each a little more zoomed out than the last.
Its simple, but the little trick of introducing the tarantula really does render the two sections of warehouse performance quite distinct.

After about 2 mins we get a section of continually cross-cutting between the 2 locations, often applying a revolving wipe effect. A lyric on 'dancing' is used to bring in a 3rd vignette, of another band member dancing - each band member gets their own little scenario, nothing complicated, but these simnple shots make a huge difference to the vid in terms of its entertainment and variety, and its potential for remaining an enjoyable view once seen a few times!

Lovely use of multiple layering from this point. At 2:47/8 we see a neat editing trick: using two shots of the singer in ECU on the mouth, shot from left and right so that each shot leaves half the frame empty - they are briefly combined in one shot.

Just in case there was any risk of avoiding cliche, we get a 4th vignette, featuring a skull and an array of candles!

I also rather enjoyed seeing the drummer's enthusiastic drumstick twirling, something that Motley Crue's Tommy Lee, copying many others before him, made into a cliche nearly 25 years ago with the Wild Side video!

You can see a making of vid here (part 1 of 3).

Prog metal performance vid: Periphery

This one was posted on by ConorO.

ACT: Periphery
TRACK: Jet Packs Was Yes!
YEAR: 2010
DIRECTOR: Eric Haviv
GENRE: Prog metal
MAIN AUDIENCE: male 15-24; significant female 15-24 appeal?



Its cliched - and useful for it!

Smoke machine; black, white, blue predominant colours; fairly basic lighting, with side light at times appearing as moon-like; great variety of shots to keep vid moving; use of slo-mo to dramatise performance.

What really caught my eye was the disconnect between the singer's stylings and the actual vocals: he was prancing about like a thrash metal (eg Slayer) singer, not the soft-rock, Evanescence-like singer he is!

Frequent movement on the shots helps create that sense of dyamism, and subtly connotes live performance/gives the staged performance a vital touch of realism (or verisimilitude).

The additional footage is simple but effective: a graveyard at nighttime. All very gothic!

Deathcore vid eg: Suicide Silence

A brief post - SamB posted on this one.
NB: THE VIDEO IS VERY VIOLENT

TRACK: YOU ONLY LIVE ONCE
YEAR: 2011
GENRE: DEATHCORE
MAIN AUDIENCE: Male, 15-24; extreme metal genre fans



A performance vid with some aspects of narrative tied to the violent lyrics.

I really like some parts of the editing: cutting the singer in downwards motion to match up with the down-tuned aggressive riff works very well to generate a visual sense of kinetic energy to go with the audio.

The violence itself is of a highly postmodern nature: some standard porn-style cliches (busty blond firing a gun) mixed with Daily Mail fantasy of such antisocial folk as the tattooed-metallers of the band getting their comeuppance from decent, hard-working middle-class people, and a mix of young and old taking their turn (commutation test: if it was only young people firing the guns, would this video ever be screened?). Nice line in self-depreciating humour when the vocalist(?) takes his turn ... and falls back, in a very unmanly fashion, with the kickback of the gun.

Its also another example of the common linkage of metal and horror, with the band effectively posited as zombies in this gore-filled vid (think Rob Zombie: metal singer to Halloween-remake director)

Here's a behind-the-scenes vid:

Sunday, 3 July 2011

3 Summer 2011 vids: Example/BadRiddim/NicScherz

Channel-flicking I happened upon three current vids; 1 fairly ingenious and certainly responsible for elevating a so-so track to global fame; 1 from a much-hyped Brit which is boringly conventional, but useful to look at because of it; and 1 which demonstrates the problematic nature of much of the video output of female pop (or R+B) acts. We also can see how more than 1 of Goodwin's concept of 3 key approaches are often seen within a single vid.

First up is a great example of how a quirky, visually arresting vid can elevate a dance track which otherwise might get limited traction: Vato Gonzalez ft. Foreign Beggars "Badman Riddim (Jump)"

At the time of viewing it had 'only' 735,000 viewings, but seems to have garnered a number of TV screenings recently.
Even more so than the Example track, there is little likelihood of deriving a clear meaning from the lyrics with which to create a narrative vid. What we get is a concept enhanced with performance, including some sharp lip-synching - the cross-cutting of the two is mutually enhancing; either by themselves would probably drag a little!
Its a perfect example of the postmodern approach: playfully referencing Japan's historic reputation for cheap, lo-fi monster flicks such as the many versions of Godzilla (ie intertextuality), and neatly making a virtue out of limited budget by having a hyper-ironic cheap cardboard set. You could also read this as a critical reflection on the Michael Bay element of the zeitgeist: daft SFX-extravaganzas such as the Transformers franchise dominating the multiplexes. The SFX are in line with the fun approach and pastiche of the vid; their child-like aspect recalls those seen in Son of Rambow.
Using the rooftop setting also ensures they didn't lose further time/money by having to control traffic/pedestrians.
The Japanese schoolgirl trope is one seen in a great many cultural settings, and has a similar array of connotations to that of Britney in the 'Hit Me Baby' vid. What might be seen as a 'darker' side of this seemingly playful, frivilous vid is seen with the hand-holding of one girl and the Godzilla-like monster, fertile territory for any Freudian (or Jungian!) psychoanalysts out there.
The fisheye lens is much in evidence, and the tight framing of the performers an increasingly common rap convention (also popular beyond that genre, seen in Foo Fighters and other rock vids). If you think about the practicalities, all they've done is add a graf-style backdrop to a room, spanning little more than 1metre across, and framed the shot so that this is all we see: clever video-making on a tight budget (tho' the backdrop still needed an artistic hand to create).


The 2nd vid is Example's "Changed the Way You Kissed Me"

Approaching 5m hits as I watched it. Its dull, but very competently put together. The lyrics don't lend themselves to any clear narrative approach (its questionable whether there is any particular meaning there), aside from some take on a romance breaking down. Nonetheless, as the vid switches from a basic concept approach to performance, we do see a matching of lyrics to action: around 1:49 in "not afraid of flying" is matched to Example crowd-surfing.
The B+W is rather pretentious BUT lends the vid a polish it might otherwise lack, and enables the slo-mo at the start to fit around common conceptions of 'arty' - our moody artiste is to be taken seriously!
The flat and external shots simply signify metropolitan lifestyle - flashes by too quickly to be clearly London-specific? This is a recording artist with global ambitions.
Always look out for THE GAZE/LOOKING: Example is quite fascinated by himself, though the early footage also signifies a privileged inside view for the audience; we see Example gearing up for a gig and performing, two sides of the man.
Its not a great vid, but the lighting is skilfully controlled, and there is sufficient variety of footage to sustain interest. The uber-cool crowd are what the couch potato viewer of the vid, watching in the un-hip North say, should aspire to as much as the style and panache of the man himself (we could consider the Uses and Gratifications theory here, or even Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs...)
We could also speculate that the limitations are actually semi-purposeful: a too-glossy approach might not suit the Example brand at this stage of his career...

The 3rd vid is from a figure featuring on X Factor (wee bit of alliteration for you folks there), and, to me, the weakest/worst of the lot: Nicole Scherzinger's "Right There"

We get the heavily made-up, high gloss lighting we expect of a pop vid (we could also label this R+B), and the sort of simulacrum (a representation of a representation of reality: Baudrillard's concept) we saw in Michael Jackson's Billie Jean of a gritty urban street setting.
There are moments in this vid when the 'artist', or at least her brand-aware director, attempts to brazen out a feminist touch, tied to the repeated call out to "all my girls". But this is a video which renders the female lead actually in a passive, objectified role (there is certainly scope to disagree with this, not least by applying a post-feminist analysis) - hardly surprising given the lyrics:
Come here baby put your hands on my body
Hands on my body oh oh oh
Right there keep it right there
I love when you put it right there yeah yeah yeah
Is this, lyrically (ie as audio only) and/or the video itself, really suitable for the young audience its aimed at? In the A2 exam we consider Media Regulation, including the Bailey Report into the sexualisation of children through media content.
NS touches herself, prances/dances (delete as you prefer!) about with her body very much the focus of the vid and virtually every frame, including several seemingly obligatory 'booty' shots.
The vid is otherwise unremarkable, with limited variation of location/setting, and just one fairly simple special effect - you could argue her body is the main special effect, rendering additional spending unnecessary.
As a band member now going solo, its also interesting to note the group of 4 women who at times appear with her - and the degree of variation (multiple ethnicities, and varying looks: the idea of beauty takes in a skinhead for example, though more conventionally sticks with the thin-bodied ideal).
Awful track and depressingly formulaic presentation of the female body as entertainment - as I'm sure you'll agree? ...

Monday, 20 June 2011

Iconic Vids1

Each of the following vids have been picked out as representative of certain trends or traits; codes and conventions, of the music vid, spanning hard rock, dance-tinged pop, and rap.
We only had time to briefly look at these in class - they're worth returning to and blogging on as you begin developing your knowledge of music vid conventions, and ability to draw upon relevant examples past or present.
 

1: MEGADETH: "PEACE SELLS"

Megadeth - Peace Sells from @pinhoone on Vimeo.

2: METALLICA: "ONE"
[you may have to toggle annotations off]


3: METALLICA: "ENTER SANDMAN"

Metallica - Enter Sandman (Official Music Video) [HD] from MetallicaHD on Vimeo.

4: MADONNA: "VOGUE"
See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GuJQSAiODqI

5: MADONNA: "LIKE A PRAYER"

MUSIC VIDEOS: Madonna - Like A Prayer from weworldentertainment on Vimeo.

6: MADONNA: "RAY OF LIGHT"
See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3ov9USxVxY

7: EMINEM: "STAN"


8: EMINEM: "MY NAME IS"

Monday, 4 April 2011

Performance vid - simple eg Jorn: Song For Ronnie James

ACT: Jorn
TRACK: Song for Ronnie James

YEAR: 2010
DIRECTOR:
(unknown)
GENRE: Heavy Metal
MAIN AUDIENCE: M 15-34+
(some female gaze?; 2ndary 35-44 aud from 80s + aspirational tweens + younger teens [10-14])  

LYRICS

Here's a really straightforward example of a performance vid. The track is a tribute to a recently-deceased metal vocalist, Ronnie James Dio; this isn't a big-budget production.
There are hints of amateurism, but whats just as significant is the overall simplicity, and how relatively easy this would be to replicate.

A quick bit of context from the Wiki - note that the '...' denotes that I've cut out a chunk of this - there's no point in simply copy/pasting large passages of text, so I've used what I've felt was strictly useful and relevant:
"Song for Ronnie James" is a song by Norwegian heavy metal singer Jorn from the tribute album Dio. It was written as a tribute to the deceased Ronnie James Dio who died a couple of months earlier. ...
The music video, together with the announce of the tribute album, was released in the internet just five days after Dio's deceasing news, which caused some critique and especulations, as Lande was accused of exploiting the death of Dio. Later the record company explained that the album had been in the works since spring of 2009, before Dio's death in May 2010.


The key ingredients?
  1. a performance space: outside can make for more interesting vids, but inside is easier to control
  2. its large enough to afford high-angled shots, props and allow the performers to perform energetically, not just have to shuffle a little until they bump into someone else (so a domestic garage wouldn't be ideal!)
  3. amps and visible electrical leads to create the verisimilitude of actual, not mimed, performance
  4. also in terms of mise-en-scene to create verisimiltude we have the tight jeans, black leather, studs, long hair (and liberal doses of facial hair!), with direction given (if required) to maintain serious, sombre expressions
  5. focus on the singer: while he's most often presented in MS, sometimes low-angled and with a fair few CUs thrown in, the others are mainly presnted in ELS and LS (tho' with CUs of fretboards thrown in, and some MSs as this isn't a typical band, so the cult of the singer is a little inappropriate in a band paying tribute to a dead vocalist). As with an actual live performance on stage, the mic-stand is a key prop
  6. shot variety - there isn't much going on, so this is utterly key; the performance would have been recorded over and over again to generate enough coverage for the editing process, including each member shot separately, and various 2/3-shots with others in the background
  7. genre-appropriate prop: quick commutation test - would a Mini, or a green, electric car be 'rock'n'roll'?! The one main prop (excepting all the musical equipment) is the car: black, sporty, macho, quite literally metallic. The one thing they've avoided is the old cliche of the busty blonde draped over the bonnet (see Whitesnake's "Here We Go Again" or better still this spoof)
  8. limited, low-key lighting. This can vary somewhat; hair-metal/glam bands are often aiming for a certain effeminancy and so use the high-key lighting more associated with glamour. The lighting behind the performers is visble: a limited, spaced out set of unexceptional lights. The performers aren't entirely flooded with fill lighting, which enables interesting shadows to form
  9. diegetic intro: the young chap behind the till is grinning gormlessly, and not a little camply, directly at the camera - this really should have been reshot
  10. sell, sell, sell ... the teen males are wearing t-shirts of Dio's bands, the shopper flicks through Dio CDs, stopping when he comes to a Korn CD (this is 'nu-metal' and so to be rejected), all the while surrounded by AC/DC CDs and displays, which might just subliminally rub off - similar music but a much more commercially successfully act!
Basic or not, the vid is just shy of 500,000 viewings at the time of writing.