Deadlines/Brief
Music videos are so 80s/90s, right? They belong with the era when MTV screened wall-to-wall vids instead of 'reality' TV? Try telling that to the millions who bought Gangnam Style; were they really simply loving the music? 1.6bn (and still climbing) have viewed the video on YT, not to mention the many re-makes (school eg, eg2), viral ads + celeb link-ups (even political protest in Seoul) - and it doesn't matter how legit it is, this nightmare for daydream Beliebers is making a lot of money, even from the parodies + dislikes. All this for a simple dance track that wouldn't have sounded out of place in 1990 ... but had a fun vid. This meme itself was soon displaced by the Harlem Shake. Music vids even cause diseases it seems!
This blog explores every aspect of this most postmodern of media formats, including other print-based promo tools used by the industry, its fast-changing nature, + how fans/audiences create/interact. Posts are primarily written with Media students/educators in mind. Please acknowledge the blog author if using any resources from this blog - Mr Dave Burrowes
This blog explores every aspect of this most postmodern of media formats, including other print-based promo tools used by the industry, its fast-changing nature, + how fans/audiences create/interact. Posts are primarily written with Media students/educators in mind. Please acknowledge the blog author if using any resources from this blog - Mr Dave Burrowes
Key Posts
- 1-shot vids
- Analysing videos
- Artist research
- Audience
- BBFC age rating vids
- Blog setup
- Books
- CONVENTIONS in 10 steps
- Conventions: DB playlists, posts etc
- Coursework overview
- DB doc
- Depeche Mode case study
- Digipak
- Digipak vids
- Elberse: Blockbusters book
- Eval overview
- Eval Q1a CONVENTIONS
- Eval Q1b REPRESENTATIONS
- Eval Q2 BRANDING
- Eval Q3a AUDIENCE ENGAGEMENT
- Eval Q3b DISTRIBUTION
- Eval Q4 TECHNOLOGIES
- Female acts
- Final Cut Pro X
- Goodwin
- Industry 2018-19
- Industry 2021
- INDUSTRY summary
- Interactive vids
- Mag ad
- Mag ad audiences
- Merch
- Pitching
- Pixies case study
- Planning docs
- Shoots tips
- Simulacra: Weezer, Weird Al
- Student vids/blogs by year
- Technologies
- TechTips blog
- Twitter feed on blog
- Vinyl
- Vodcast playlist (DB)
- WEBSITE in steps
- Websites I've analysed
Featured post
WEBSITE The steps involved in producing yours
IN THIS POST: A breakdown of how to research websites, what to look for, and an example of an overall 16-step process, plus a list of some...
Showing posts with label warner bros. Show all posts
Showing posts with label warner bros. Show all posts
Tuesday, 8 August 2017
STREAMING Warner soars past $1bn digital revenues
The conglomerate giant doing fine, artists less so...
Ed Sheeran’s Divide puts Warner Music’s streaming income on track to cross £1bn https://www.theguardian.com/business/2017/aug/08/ed-sheerans-divide-lifts-warner-musics-streaming-income-to-1bn?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Blogger
Labels:
big 3,
disruption,
Ed Sheeran,
Spotify,
streaming,
warner bros
Tuesday, 14 February 2017
Big Three Sony Universal Warners
In film its the big six (7 if you count Lionsgate); in the music industry, following a controversial 2012 $2bn takeover of EMI by Universal, its just the big three: Sony Music Entertainment, Warner Music Group, and Universal Music Group. Sony and Universal also combine on the VEVO platform.
See: thebalance.com feature on the big 3; musicbusinessworldwide.com (the spin on this one is a bit odd - that the ENTIRE Indie industry beats any one of the big three individually); digitalmusicnews.com; this pdf.
You can see how the industry has gone through dramatic 'disruption' from digitisation - but with little impact on the market share of the dominant conglomerates:
See: thebalance.com feature on the big 3; musicbusinessworldwide.com (the spin on this one is a bit odd - that the ENTIRE Indie industry beats any one of the big three individually); digitalmusicnews.com; this pdf.
![]() |
Table from digitalmusicnews. |
![]() |
Source: p.11 of this report (pdf). |
Thursday, 29 December 2016
INDUSTRY Big 3 revenues streaming surge
Music streaming hailed as industry's saviour as labels enjoy profit surge https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/dec/29/music-streaming-industry-saviour-labels-spotify-apple-music?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Blogger
Will Spotify kill the music download?
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/dec/26/spotify-music-download-apple-itunes-streaming-vinyl?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Copy_to_clipboard
Record sales: vinyl hits 25-year high
https://www.theguardian.com/music/2017/jan/03/record-sales-vinyl-hits-25-year-high-and-outstrips-streaming?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Copy_to_clipboard
Labels:
Adele,
big 3,
music industry,
Spotify,
streaming,
Universal,
warner bros
Tuesday, 8 April 2014
Anita Elberse (2013) Blockbusters - must-read book?
"Because people are inherently social," the Harvard business professor Anita Elberse points out, "they generally find value in reading the same books and watching the same television shows and movies that others do." What's more, and equally understandably: "People have a taste for winners: if, say, a book is popular and has been widely discussed in the media, consumers have more reason to read it." [from Guardian review]
![]() |
Scroll down for sample quotes and review snippets, such as Bloomberg's fairly critical view |
![]() |
Use the look inside feature for a preview |
She very convincingly picks out examples of major conglomerates that have tried more austere, penny-pinching approaches ... and shows, with forensic financial detail, how disastrous this invariably proved.
Interesting that she's not simply referring to production, but also as much about distribution, and the marketing muscle and capacity to make very widely available and prominently placed a given release, Lady Gaga being one such example she dissects.
You can preview some samples by using Amazon's 'look inside' feature, or GoogleBooks (add keywords related to cinema, music or whichever industry you're most interested in to get the most relevant sections), and its for sale as a Kindle book too.
Here's a few snippets from various articles/reviews:
"Because people are inherently social," the Harvard business professor Anita Elberse points out, "they generally find value in reading the same books and watching the same television shows and movies that others do." What's more, and equally understandably: "People have a taste for winners: if, say, a book is popular and has been widely discussed in the media, consumers have more reason to read it." [Guardian review]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)