CIAE Q1b
'how does it represent social groups or issues'
DIRECT EXAM LINK:
This is essentially practice for the first half of your exam: the Q1b REPRESENTATION topic (and AUDIENCE eg U+G, with further links to GENRE eg sub-culture, NARRATIVE eg hero's journey and MEDIA LANGUAGE eg simulacra), and links into Q1a, especially 'U' (use of conventions).
You need to consider and select a range of theories from your MANGeR pack, and apply both elements of
semiotics when you provide examples:
- specific and precise denotation (WHAT you did)
- analysis of possible connotations (WHY you did)
A VERY BRIEF OVERVIEW:
Tackle either 1 character/setting at a time (highlighting any
binaries) or 1
demographic/issue at a time.
You should see
links with your AS exam TV Drama Q, which also requires you to discuss issues raised through media language choices.
Basic judgements to make: stereo/arche/countertype; normative/counter-hegemonic - or a mix (which might fit with narrative theories, eg
Campbell's monomyth, Todorov's new
equilibrium) - and WHY you did this, linked directly to audience/s targeted.
U+G is an obvious theory to use - there are many more below and in Q1b exam pack.
What social groups? 2 basics: gender, age (teen,
tween etc). Sexuality. Ethnicity. Nationality/regionality. Rural/urban/metropolitan. Social class and status (
ABC1CDE). Religion/spirituality. Dis/ability.
What issues? Sexuality and gender are likely to be foremost:
hetero-normative?
Queering?
(Fe)male gaze? Performativity of gender? The obvious '
ism' is
(post-)feminism, but
capitalism/consumerism and
postmodernism (challenges to perceptions of an observable reality,
meta-narratives; deconstructionism; simulacra) also. Look back at the in-depth case studies of
Breaking Bad and other TV Drama clips for more inspiration.
Work through the embedded PowerPoint below for a range of suggested theories and terms
THE STUART HALL ISSUE:
How YOU
planned to
represent and have audiences respond to people and places in your video
etc is
not necessarily how they did - it would be useful to include some
audience feedback and reflection on this. Where was there
polysemy that
enabled some audience members (perhaps of certain demographics: gender?
age? nationality?) to give a
negotiated or even oppositional reading?
REPRESENTATION OF WHO OR WHAT? + AUDIENCE ISSUES
You
can approach this question in two fundamental ways: tackling one
category of representation at a time OR separately analysing each
character and place in turn. Representation is also a major issue for audience (eg U+G).