Music videos are so 80s/90s, right? They belong with the era when MTV screened wall-to-wall vids instead of 'reality' TV? Try telling that to the millions who bought Gangnam Style; were they really simply loving the music? 1.6bn (and still climbing) have viewed the video on YT, not to mention the many re-makes (school eg, eg2), viral ads + celeb link-ups (even political protest in Seoul) - and it doesn't matter how legit it is, this nightmare for daydream Beliebers is making a lot of money, even from the parodies + dislikes. All this for a simple dance track that wouldn't have sounded out of place in 1990 ... but had a fun vid. This meme itself was soon displaced by the Harlem Shake. Music vids even cause diseases it seems!
This blog explores every aspect of this most postmodern of media formats, including other print-based promo tools used by the industry, its fast-changing nature, + how fans/audiences create/interact. Posts are primarily written with Media students/educators in mind. Please acknowledge the blog author if using any resources from this blog - Mr Dave Burrowes

Tuesday, 26 January 2016

Websites I've analysed

All of the following have been analysed in some detail (that's the 'website analysis' tag link)

Pilgrim (student; pop/Indie band) [blog]
LittleMonsters (Lady Gaga fans) [blog]
Sly Antics (UK Indie band) [blog] - note: by unfortunate coincidence, they changed their website almost within hours of my reviewing what is now their old one!

I've also briefly looked at a range of website banners, top links, basic branding, in this post:

  • Adam Ant (US and UK)
  • Alt-J
  • The 1975
  • You Me At Six
  • Charlie Puth
  • Shawn Mendes
  • Bullet For My Valentine
  • AC/DC

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please ensure your comment is appropriate for publishing; all comments are vetted before publication